The legitimacy of representation: How descriptive, formal, and responsiveness representation affect the acceptability of political decisions S Arnesen, Y Peters Comparative Political Studies 51 (7), 868-899, 2018 | 175 | 2018 |
Legitimacy from decision-making influence and outcome favourability: Results from general population survey experiments S Arnesen Political Studies 65 (1_suppl), 146-161, 2017 | 92 | 2017 |
Medvirkning med virkning? Innbyggermedvirkning i den kommunale beslutningsprosessen JE Klausen, S Arnesen, DA Christensen, B Folkestad, GS Hanssen, ... Norsk institutt for by-og regionforskning, 2013 | 78* | 2013 |
Do citizens make inferences from political candidate characteristics when aiming for substantive representation? S Arnesen, D Duell, MP Johannesson Electoral Studies 57, 46-60, 2019 | 73 | 2019 |
Conditional legitimacy: How turnout, majority size, and outcome affect perceptions of legitimacy in European Union membership referendums S Arnesen, TS Broderstad, MP Johannesson, J Linde European Union Politics 20 (2), 176-197, 2019 | 59 | 2019 |
Contextual data for the European Social Survey. An overview and assessment of extant sources LT Rydland, S Arnesen, ÅG Østensen Vol. Bergen [Norway]: Norwegian Social Science Data Services (NSD), 2008 | 39* | 2008 |
Could information about herd immunity help us achieve herd immunity? Evidence from a population representative survey experiment S Arnesen, K Bærøe, C Cappelen, B Carlsen Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 46 (8), 854-858, 2018 | 32 | 2018 |
Valgdeltagelsen ved kommunestyrevalget 2011 DA Christensen, S Arnesen, G Ødegård, J Bergh | 31 | 2013 |
Prediction Markets vs Polls–an Examination of Accuracy for the 2008 and 2012 Elections. S Arnesen, OJ Bergfjord University of Buckingham Press, 2014 | 19 | 2014 |
Organisasjonsengasjement blant innvandrarar I Eimhjellen, S Arnesen Rapport fra Senter for forskning på sivilsamfunn og frivillig sektor, 2018 | 18 | 2018 |
Do polls influence opinions? Investigating poll feedback loops using the novel dynamic response feedback experimental procedure S Arnesen, MP Johannesson, J Linde, S Dahlberg Social Science Computer Review 36 (6), 735-743, 2018 | 16 | 2018 |
Frivillighetens grunnfjell: Hvem gir mest tid og penger til frivillige organisasjoner? A Fladmoe, I Eimhjellen, KH Sivesind, S Arnesen Rapport fra Senter for forskning på sivilsamfunn og frivillig sektor, 2019 | 15 | 2019 |
How to be gracious about political loss—The importance of good loser messages in policy controversies P Esaiasson, S Arnesen, H Werner Comparative Political Studies 56 (5), 599-624, 2023 | 13 | 2023 |
Frivillig deltakelse i Norden: Et komparativt perspektiv S Arnesen, B Folkestad, S Gjerde Rapport fra Senter for forskning på sivilsamfunn og frivillig sektor, 2013 | 11 | 2013 |
Using prediction market data for measuring the expected closeness in electoral research O Strijbis, S Arnesen, L Bernhard Electoral Studies 44, 144-150, 2016 | 10* | 2016 |
Norwegian citizen panel wave 7 E Ivarsflaten, S Arnesen, B Folkestad, E Tvinnereim, M Johannesson, ... Ideas2Evidence. Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen and UNI Research Rokkan …, 2016 | 9 | 2016 |
Forecasting Norwegian elections: Out of work and out of office S Arnesen International Journal of Forecasting 28 (4), 789-796, 2012 | 9 | 2012 |
Explaining variance in the accuracy of prediction markets O Strijbis, S Arnesen International Journal of Forecasting 35 (1), 408-419, 2019 | 8 | 2019 |
How prediction markets help us understand events ‘impact on the vote in US Presidential Elections S Arnesen Leaping into the unknown: Comparing, testing, and applying methods of …, 2011 | 7 | 2011 |
Support for electoral system reform among voters and politicians: Studying information effects through survey experiments S Arnesen, J Bergh, DA Christensen, B Aardal Electoral studies 71, 102313, 2021 | 6 | 2021 |