| Designing and implementing e-Justice Systems: Some lessons learned from EU and Canadian Examples G Lupo, J Bailey Laws 3 (2), 353-387, 2014 | 89 | 2014 |
| Making EU justice smart? Looking into the implementation of new technologies to improve the efficiency of cross border justice services delivery G Lupo, M Velicogna Smart Technologies for Smart Governments: Transparency, Efficiency and …, 2018 | 18 | 2018 |
| Assessing e-Justice smartness: A new framework for e-justice evaluation through public values G Lupo Setting foundations for the creation of public value in smart cities, 77-113, 2019 | 16 | 2019 |
| Evaluating e-Justice: The design of an assessment framework for e-justice systems G Lupo eAccess to Justice, 53-94, 2016 | 15 | 2016 |
| Law, technology and system architectures: Critical design factors for money claim and possession claim online in England and Wales G Lupo The Circulation of Agency in E-Justice: Interoperability and Infrastructures …, 2013 | 15 | 2013 |
| Is immigration detrimental for social trust in the European Union? A three-level model of cultural heterogeneity and citizenship regime as social capital predictors G Lupo International Journal of Social Inquiry 3 (1), 67-96, 2010 | 15 | 2010 |
| From drafting common rules to implementing electronic European civil procedures: The rise of e-CODEX M Velicogna, G Lupo From common rules to best practices in European Civil Procedure, 181-212, 2017 | 10 | 2017 |
| The ethics of Artificial Intelligence: An analysis of ethical frameworks disciplining AI in justice and other contexts of application G Lupo Oñati Socio-Legal Series 12 (3), 614-653, 2022 | 8 | 2022 |
| The case of money claim online and possession claim online in England and Wales G Lupo Building Interoperability for European Civil Proceedings Online, 111-160, 2013 | 8 | 2013 |
| Smart Justice in Italy: Cases of Apps Created by Lawyers for Lawyers and Beyond G Lupo, D Carnevali Laws 11 (3), 51, 2022 | 7 | 2022 |
| Some European and Australian e-justice services M Fabri, G Lupo Towards Cyberjustice Project, Working Paper, 2012 | 7 | 2012 |
| Regulating (Artificial) Intelligence in Justice: How Normative Frameworks Protect Citizens from the Risks Related to AI Use in the Judiciary G Lupo European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities 8 (2), 75-96, 2019 | 6 | 2019 |
| Is immigration detrimental for social trust in the European Union G Lupo A three-level model of, 2010 | 4 | 2010 |
| Simplifying access to justice in cross-border litigation, the national practices and the limits of the EU procedures. The example of the service of documents in the order for … M Velicogna, G Lupo, EA Ontanu EGPA Annual Conference, PSG XVIII: Justice and Court Administration (24-29 …, 2015 | 3 | 2015 |
| Explaining Successes and Failures of E-Justice Services in Europe: The Cases of Money Claim on-Line, Trial Online, e-Barreaux and e-Codex G Lupo Law and Society Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, USA 1, 2013 | 3 | 2013 |
| Risky artificial intelligence: The role of incidents in the path to AI regulation G Lupo Law, Technology and Humans 5 (1), 133-152, 2023 | 2 | 2023 |
| ICT Development and Business Process Modelling in the Legal Domain: The Experience of e-CODEX M Velicogna, G Lupo European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities 8 (1), 22-47, 2019 | 2 | 2019 |
| laws MDPI A Madera, AD Rodriguez, A Guadamuz, B Cieslinska, C Leone, ... | | 2022 |
| Acknowledgment to Reviewers of Laws in 2021 A Madera, DW Greene, A Das, D Perkumienė, A Howe, DB Schwab, ... | | 2022 |
| Lawyers and Smart Technologies: Experiences of Apps' Development in a Justice Environment. G Lupo, D Carnevali EGOV-CeDEM-ePart-*, 177-189, 2021 | | 2021 |
